Editorial

Wall Street's Quiet Bet: How Cantor, Susquehanna, and Kalshi Are Rewriting the Rules of Prediction Markets

Bentoshi

In the quiet hours of August 2024, a press release from Cantor Fitzgerald landed in my inbox with the subtlety of a whisper. For most crypto natives, it was just another brokerage announcement—another attempt to bridge TradFi and digital assets. But for those of us who have spent years tracking the slow, painful bleed of liquidity in prediction markets, it was a seismic shift. Cantor Fitzgerald, the 80-year-old investment bank that survived 9/11 and still clears over $1 trillion in U.S. Treasuries monthly, had become the first full-service broker to offer clients access to Kalshi—a CFTC-regulated prediction market exchange. And they weren't coming alone. Susquehanna International Group, the quant powerhouse that dominates options trading and runs one of the largest proprietary trading desks in the world, was stepping in as the designated market maker. The message was clear: Wall Street had just placed a very quiet, very large bet on the future of prediction markets.

From the ashes of 2017 to the fluidity of DeFi, I've watched narratives rise and fall. I've analyzed over 500 ICOs, tracked liquidity flows through DeFi summer, and witnessed the collapse of Terra's algorithmic stablecoin. But this moment feels different. It's not about a new token or a clever smart contract. It's about the institutionalization of a category that many still dismiss as gambling. To understand why this matters, we need to step back and look at the history of prediction markets—and why they've always been a promise unfulfilled.

Prediction markets have been around since the 1990s, with platforms like Iowa Electronic Markets pioneering academic research. But they never scaled. The narrative was always "too small, too niche, too risky." In 2014, Augur brought them on-chain, but the user experience was terrible and liquidity was fragmented. Then came Polymarket in 2020, riding the DeFi wave and capturing the imagination of retail traders with its sleek interface and permissionless design. By 2024, Polymarket had processed over $1 billion in volume, largely driven by the U.S. election cycle. But a billion dollars in crypto terms is still a rounding error in the world of institutional finance. The barrier wasn't technology—it was trust. Institutions couldn't navigate the regulatory gray zone, couldn't execute large orders without moving the price, and couldn't rely on a counterparty that might disappear tomorrow.

Enter Kalshi. Founded in 2018, Kalshi is a CFTC-registered Designated Contract Market (DCM), meaning it operates under the same regulatory framework as the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. It offers event contracts—binary options tied to outcomes like "Will the Fed cut rates in September?" or "Will the S&P 500 close above 5,500?"—but its liquidity has always been thin. The order book depth was a joke. A $10,000 order could move the price by 5%. That's not a market; it's a hobby. The core problem was that institutions had no way to enter without causing massive slippage, and no trusted broker to facilitate the handshake. Cantor Fitzgerald and Susquehanna just solved both problems.

Cantor's solution is elegantly simple: they bring their institutional clients—hedge funds, asset managers, family offices—and offer them a block trade facility. Instead of hitting the order book, a client can call Cantor, request a price on a specific event contract, and execute a trade directly with Susquehanna as the counterparty. The trade is then processed through Kalshi's exchange, ensuring regulatory compliance and settlement. This is the same model Cantor uses for corporate bonds and OTC derivatives, where deep liquidity is provided by a single market maker rather than a fragmented order book. It's a fusion of TradFi's private negotiation and crypto's on-chain settlement, with the CFTC standing guard.

I've spent years arguing that prediction markets are sociological phenomena first, financial instruments second. But this event flips that script. For the first time, the narrative is being driven not by retail FOMO but by the cold, calculated logic of risk management. Susquehanna's Joe Grubb, who leads the newly formed prediction markets desk, explicitly framed it as a hedging tool: "A lot of stuff that you might want to hedge isn't covered by the insurance market or the traditional options market." This is a direct appeal to the institutional psyche—not "bet on the election," but "hedge your portfolio against political risk." And that's a much larger addressable market.

From the ashes of 2017 to the fluidity of DeFi, I've seen how narratives evolve. The ICO boom was a story of democratized fundraising. DeFi was a story of permissionless finance. NFTs were a story of digital identity. Each one had a moment of institutional validation—a Coinbase listing, a venture capital round, a regulatory nod. But this is different. This is not a hedge fund buying tokens; it's a bank building a pipeline. Cantor's Pascal Bandelier, who oversees the firm's equity and fixed-income block trading desks, is applying the same playbook to event contracts. That means Kalshi is no longer a retail experiment; it's a new asset class with a dedicated brokerage infrastructure.

Let's talk about the competitive landscape. Polymarket is the 800-pound gorilla in the room, with over $1 billion in cumulative volume and a loyal user base. But Polymarket is unregulated, operates outside the U.S. for most practical purposes, and relies on a decentralized order book that can't handle large blocks without significant slippage. The Cantor-Kalshi-Susquehanna alliance directly challenges Polymarket's narrative of being the "default" prediction market. Institutions that need to comply with SEC and CFTC rules will naturally gravitate toward Kalshi. The question is whether Polymarket can pivot to offer institutional services without losing its decentralized ethos. I suspect it will try, but the regulatory gap is a chasm that cannot be bridged with a smart contract upgrade.

Now, the contrarian angle. For all the bullish implications, there's a darker undercurrent. The institutionalization of prediction markets may accelerate their centralization, turning them into just another walled garden under the control of a few gatekeepers. Cantor, Susquehanna, and Kalshi form a triopoly that sets prices, controls access, and can freeze trades if the CFTC comes knocking. This is the opposite of what the crypto ethos promised. And it's a risk that many retail traders overlook. If the entire market depends on Susquehanna's willingness to provide liquidity, a single bad day could cause a liquidity crisis. Remember the 2010 Flash Crash? Susquehanna was one of the firms that stepped in to stabilize markets, but they also profited handsomely. The same concentration risk exists here.

Moreover, the regulatory sword cuts both ways. The CFTC has been hostile to certain types of event contracts, particularly those related to political outcomes. In 2022, it blocked Kalshi from listing election contracts, citing concerns about "gaming" and "public interest." The case is still in court. If the CFTC ultimately bans election contracts, the entire institutional thesis collapses. Cantor and Susquehanna are betting on a favorable ruling, but that's a binary risk that could wipe out the entire infrastructure overnight. The narrative of "institutional adoption" is tightly coupled with "regulatory clarity," and clarity is an illusion that can be shattered by a single court decision.

Another blind spot: the assumption that institutions will actually use this. Hedge funds are notoriously conservative. They may dabble in event contracts for hedging, but the volume might be much smaller than optimists expect. The correlation between prediction market payouts and traditional portfolio risk is not well understood. Most risk managers use VaR models that don't include political event contracts. The educational hurdle is huge, and Cantor doesn't have the resources to train every CIO on the benefits of binary options.

From the ashes of 2017 to the fluidity of DeFi, I've learned that the most transformative narratives are also the most fragile. The 2020 DeFi boom was fueled by yield farming, which turned out to be a Ponzi-like mechanism. The 2021 NFT mania was driven by identity signaling, which collapsed when liquidity dried up. The prediction market narrative is different because it's rooted in a real need: the ability to hedge against uncertainty in a world that's becoming more uncertain by the day. Climate change, political polarization, pandemics, technological disruption—these are all tail risks that traditional insurance and options markets struggle to price. Prediction markets, with their ability to aggregate information from diverse participants, offer a potential solution. But whether they will actually fulfill that promise depends on how the next few months play out.

My takeaway is this: The Cantor-Susquehanna-Kalshi deal is a proof of concept, not a done deal. It validates the thesis that institutions want exposure to event-driven markets, but it doesn't guarantee they will commit capital at scale. The real test will come in the fourth quarter of 2024, when the U.S. election dominates the news cycle. If Kalshi sees a surge in institutional volume—say, $100 million in election-related block trades—the narrative will shift from "interesting experiment" to "must-have infrastructure." If the volume is mediocre, the hype will fade, and the industry will remain a niche playground for retail speculators.

For the crypto-native reader, the implications are clear: Polymarket's monopoly on attention is over. The next bull run in prediction markets will be driven by TradFi, not DeFi. And that means the metrics that matter are no longer TVL or user count, but compliance status, brokerage partnerships, and market maker commitments. I'll be watching the Kalshi order book depth charts and the CFTC court case like a hawk. The narrative is shifting, and the hunters who adapt first will capture the alpha.

From the ashes of 2017 to the fluidity of DeFi, I've seen the cycle repeat. But this time, the cycle is being written by Wall Street, not by a whitepaper. And that changes everything.

Market Prices

BTC Bitcoin
$80,826.6 +3.77%
ETH Ethereum
$2,509.33 +4.29%
SOL Solana
$103.77 +2.94%
BNB BNB Chain
$716.9 +2.75%
XRP XRP Ledger
$1.45 +5.48%
DOGE Dogecoin
$0.0873 +5.10%
ADA Cardano
$0.2220 +7.77%
AVAX Avalanche
$7.49 +2.69%
DOT Polkadot
$0.8740 -0.49%
LINK Chainlink
$11.95 +6.29%

Fear & Greed

74

Greed

Market Sentiment

Event Calendar

{{年份}}
15
04
halving Bitcoin Halving

Block reward reduced to 3.125 BTC

18
03
unlock Sui Token Unlock

Team and early investor shares released

22
03
unlock Optimism Unlock

Circulating supply increases by about 2%

30
04
upgrade Celestia Mainnet Upgrade

Improves data availability sampling efficiency

28
03
unlock Arbitrum Token Unlock

92 million ARB released

12
05
halving BCH Halving

Block reward halving event

10
05
upgrade Ethereum Pectra Upgrade

Raises validator limit and account abstraction

08
04
upgrade Solana Firedancer

Independent validator client goes live on mainnet

Market Cap

All →
1
Bitcoin
BTC
$80,826.6
1
Ethereum
ETH
$2,509.33
1
Solana
SOL
$103.77
1
BNB Chain
BNB
$716.9
1
XRP Ledger
XRP
$1.45
1
Dogecoin
DOGE
$0.0873
1
Cardano
ADA
$0.2220
1
Avalanche
AVAX
$7.49
1
Polkadot
DOT
$0.8740
1
Chainlink
LINK
$11.95

Tools

All →

Altseason Index

41

Bitcoin Season

BTC Dominance Altseason

Gas Tracker

Ethereum 28 Gwei
BNB Chain 3 Gwei
Polygon 42 Gwei
Arbitrum 0.5 Gwei
Optimism 0.3 Gwei

🐋 Whale Tracker

🟢
0x301c...2479
1h ago
In
741.46 BTC
🔴
0x8d19...08d8
30m ago
Out
321 ETH
🔴
0x0f41...be38
12m ago
Out
2,340.03 BTC

💡 Smart Money

0xbe8e...6bbf
Institutional Custody
+$4.7M
65%
0x77a7...0f3e
Experienced On-chain Trader
+$0.8M
70%
0xff39...3e2f
Experienced On-chain Trader
+$3.3M
61%